The Greats: Alfred Hitchcock


Born: August 13th, 1899 in Leystone, London, England

Died: 29 April 1980 (aged 80) in Bel Air, California

Occupation: film director/film producer

Active Years: 1921 – 1976

1 Spouse/1 Child

I don’t know a single person in my life who has never seen at least one Alfred Hitchcock movie. I know of over 50 of his movies that I want to see. Not just because he’s popular and has many classic “must-see” movies in his library, but because, in my humble opinion, he’s the best director who ever lived. He did things with camera angles and cinematography that even the fanciest of cameras and the best directors of today could never do. Many have tried but none can get it just right. It can be argued that no green screen or CGI graphics today could do better than Hitchcock. He didn’t just break the mold of filming, he invented molds! 

Take Rope for example, starring James Steward and Farley Granger, among many other stars. In this movie he did something no one had ever done. He had a stage built specifically for what he had in mind. He wanted to do continuous filming without taking any cuts or having to film a scene over again. It’s similar to watching a Broadway show but in a movie theater. Back in the 40’s and 50’s however, one roll of film could only shoot up to 10 minutes before a new roll would have to be put in. Watch the movie to see how he got around it, and if you happen to get the special edition copy, watch the extras to learn the controversy behind the script and how the set had to be manipulated simultaneously while filming. Something that was never done before, until Hitchcock stepped onto the scene.

One thing about almost all of his movies that I love looking for is how or where he makes his cameo appearance. Some movies you can see it’s him outright but others, like Rope, you’d have to know the history of the movie to know where he is. Although, his size and distinctive face, make it hard NOT to notice him when he’s on camera.

There is so much that can be said about any number of Hitchcock films. Watch them alone or with a group of friends. He’ll keep you guessing and he’ll inspire even the writer in all of us to get to work on something just as good. He knew how to work with people. He was able to get the best and worst out of anyone who was willing to put their career in his hands. His characters all had a depth that he was able to reveal best when there were no lines at all. Just by the angle of the camera on the actors face and you’d know what kind of person they were. Watch James Stewart in Rear Window or Vertigo and see what I mean. Or The Birds, a movie with very little dialogue but speaks volumes when it comes to content and acting ability. The only thing better than watching an Alfred Hitchcock film is the occasional added bonus of TCM’s Robert Osbourne giving you some history and fun facts before and after the movie. Or pick up any book about his movies. My personal favorite and go to guide is:

Hitchcock Filmography

(movies I’ve seen will be marked in BOLD)

  • No. 13 (1922) (unfinished)
  • Always Tell Your Wife (1923) (unfinished)
  • The Pleasure Garden (1925)
  • The Mountain Eagle (1926) (lost)
  • The Lodger: A Story of the London Fog (1927)
  • The Ring (1927)
  • Downhill (1927)
  • The Farmer’s Wife (1928)
  • Easy Virtue (1928)
  • Champagne (1928)
  • The Manxman (1929)
  • Blackmail (1929)
  • Juno and the Paycock (1930)
  • Murder! (1930)
  • Elstree Calling (1930)
  • The Skin Game (1931)
  • Mary (1931)
  • Rich and Strange (1931)
  • Number Seventeen (1932)
  • Waltzes from Vienna (1933)
  • The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934)
  • The 39 Steps (1935)
  • Secret Agent (1936)
  • Sabotage (1936)
  • Young and Innocent (1937)
  • The Lady Vanishes (1938)
  • Jamaica Inn (1939)
  • Rebecca (1940)
  • Foreign Correspondent (1940)
  • Mr. & Mrs. Smith (1941)
  • Suspicion (1941)
  • Saboteur (1942)
  • Shadow of a Doubt (1943)
  • Lifeboat (1943)
  • Aventure Malgache (1944)
  • Bon Voyage (1944)
  • Spellbound (1945)
  • Notorious (1946)
  • The Paradine Case (1947)
  • Rope (1948)
  • Under Capricorn (1949)
  • Stage Fright (1950)
  • Strangers on a Train (1951)
  • I Confess (1953)
  • Dial M for Murder (1954)
  • Rear Window (1954)
  • To Catch a Thief (1955)
  • The Trouble with Harry (1955)
  • The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956)
  • The Wrong Man (1956)
  • Vertigo (1958)
  • North by Northwest (1959)
  • Psycho (1960)
  • The Birds (1963)
  • Marnie (1964)
  • Torn Curtain (1966)
  • Topaz (1969)
  • Frenzy (1972)
  • Family Plot (1976)

Which Hitchcock movies have you seen? Which was your favorite? Why? Which have you always wanted to see but haven’t yet?

Possessed (1947)

Title: Possessed (1947)

Director: Curtis Bernhardt

Screenwriter(s): Sylvia Richards & Ronald MacDougall

Producer: Jerry Wald

Distributor: Warner Bros.

In Theaters: July 26th, 1947

Run Time: 108 minutes

Color: B&W

Starring: Joan Crawford, Van Heflin, Raymond Massey, Geraldine Brooks

Genre(s): drama/film-noir/thriller

Storyline: A dazed woman walks the streets of Los Angeles looking for a man named David. After collapsing in a diner, she’s taken to the psychiatric ward of a nearby hospital. Flashbacks reveal her obsession for David as a result of borderline personality disorder which ultimately leads to murder. Written by Daniel Bubbeo

Movie Trailer: 

My Review: I’ve only ever seen one other Joan Crawford movie, What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?, and then it was Bette Davis who stole the show. Robert Osbourne explained before the movie began that this movie is by far Ms. Crawford’s best performance. Having only seen one other movie I cannot say I agree with him definitively but I’m inclined to believe anything Robert Osbourne says. He is the expert when it comes to classic movies.

It starts with a seemingly “possessed” woman, wandering the streets, looking for David. It’s not 100% certain who Steven is, for all we know it could be her son, but if you watched this on TCM then you’d know who he is from Robert Osbournes introduction. Steven is a man our main character is hopelessly in love with. So much so it triggers in her a paranoid schizophrenic state. She will do anything, even murder, to get him. Her role as a calculated woman turned woman on the edge is brilliant. It is said she spent a long time learning all she could about mental patients and had a doctor who specializes in trying to cure the mentally ill, work with her. Joan Crawford, I’m sure, was a perfectionist when it came to getting down the emotions of her characters. She gave her all on this performance, and I’m sure in her others as well.

The way she is able to manipulate people, everyone except David of course, and also the way she’s able to convince herself, is great. You find yourself feeling for her on a human level then, almost just as suddenly, hoping she gets what she deserves. I honestly cannot seem to understand how a man can drive a woman to such lengths of madness but I guess it was common then and it’s no different now. My only other issue I had with this movie was how it ended. I must give you a little history of the storyline in order to explain myself better. She is a caretaker to an older, sickly woman. This woman (whom we never actually see, just hear her annoying voice) has a husband, who she fears is having an affair with her nurse, and a daughter, who believes anything she tells her (namely about her fathers alleged infidelities). Once it is established that the elderly woman “committed suicide,” Louise (Joan Crawford) ends up marrying her patients newly widowed husband, in hopes of making David jealous. She also manages to make the daughter like her. It isn’t until much later, when she discovers that David and the daughter intend on marrying that she really goes wildly insane. I won’t give any spoilers away but she ends up recounting practically her entire life story for a doctor at a mental hospital where she was taken after she was found wandering around the streets in search of David. My issue is, once her story is told and her husband finds her at the hospital, he is told the diagnosis and is taken to see her. When he asks the doctor to leave so he can have a moment alone with his psychotic wife (who I still believe killed his first wife, although he explains to her that it couldn’t have been her) I expected him to kill her! I think that would have been a “WOW” ending. Maybe that’s just me.

Have you seen this movie? What did you think of it? What’s your favorite Joan Crawford movie (if you’ve seen any of her countless others)?

My Rating: B